challenger 2 vs m1a2 sep

Вторник Декабрь 29th, 2020 0 Автор

M1A2 SEP, Challenger 2, Merkava, TK-X, Leclerc vs. Leopard 2, K2 Black Panther, T-90, Oplot, Type 99 Abrams M1A2 SEP vs. The Leopard 2A6 also uses torsion bar suspension but has a much more powerful engine at just over 1450 hp. The L30 is 120mm in diameter and 55-calibers long, made from high tech steel with a chromium alloy lining. Other features include a thermal sleeve, fume extraction and and an all electric stabilisation. - … Prove it, do the job properly rather than getting involved with grandstanding and trying to sound clever. Challenger 2 vs Leopard 2 A6 vs M1A1 M1A2 Abrams - Duration: 9:55. Favourite answer. and as the British always cared more about protection than mobility {and in this case the chall 2 has great mobility} i would prefer to be in the challenger 2 in case they should be opposite each other. No? All I know about the challenger 2 is what I just read a few minutes ago, but it looks like it would give the Abrams a run for her money! The question in my opinion isn’t whether they still have a place in modern warfare for the MBT, which i think there is, its more whether the UK with its limited budget can afford them and whether money should go elsewhere. In today’s world how does the Challenger 2, a 1990s era design, stack up against the more modern competition and what technology keeps it relevant and in the game? Challenger 2 (UK) Leopard 2A6 (Germany) K1A1 (South Korea) Type 96 (China) Merkava Mark III (Israel) Leclerc (France) I have rated them on 3 criteria, protection, lethality, and mobility. And please don't worry, your report will be anonymous. However, the current M1A2 SEP V2/V3 with TUSK can wipe the floor with the Challenger 2. Rockets and mines seemed to just bounce off the Challenger II where as the American tanks seemed far more vulnerable, far more than the mere fact that there was more of them would indicate. Husband cannot come into medical center due to COVID policy. Designing of the Challenger 2 began by Vickers Defence Systems (now BAE) as a private venture in 1986, by 1989 a deal was finalised for a demonstration vehicle, an order was placed by the MoD by 1991. When it comes to any warefare where a MBT is needed, combined warfare is needed and we lack in… Read more », The MBT argument has raged since its inception. The range of Challenger 2 has recently been stated as 550km by the British Army, this is however only on road. that wasn't the tanks fault but the crews. The T-90 can also use high explosive fragmentation ammunition and anti-tank guided missiles. 1994-ben 800 millió font értékben további 259 darab harckocsit és 9 darab gyakorló járművet rendeltek, melyeket 1998-ban állítottak szolgálatba, ezzel leváltva a Challenger … the guns; there is still no proof that the smooth bore is better than a rifled tank gun, my opinion is that the rotation given by the rifling gives the round more stability ,over long distance. Challenger 2 can carry 49 main armament rounds, a mixture of the aforementioned HESH and APFSDS as well as white phosphorus smoke rounds. What a load of badly written tosh! The Merkava has quite some different design, while the tanks of other nations are considerably lighter if memory serves me right. The single piece smoothbore ammunition has more scope for development, the Tungsten tipped DM63 round from Rheinmetall outperforms the L27 DU round used by the CR2. The SEP has a faster FC computer, a higher resolution scope, better armor courtesy of the Depleted Uranium and is soon going to be fitted with a new generation of reactive armor designed to … And Challenger can fire HEAT rounds. Mobility: 1. . ). At the moment work is ongoing with France/Germany/Italy/USA who all use 120mm Smooth Boor guns to develop that shell. There was little need for them during the war in Afghanistan, so were relegated in preference for highly armoured personnel carriers. Filter. Next Last. dsm37127. Rheinmatall the manufacturer have also developed an upgrade that allows the gun to fire anti-tank guided missiles. ... considering the British said the M1A2 would have better KE protection in a frontal arc than the Challenger 2, which has around 650mm vs KE in … Like Challeger 2 APFSDS rounds are used. It also incorporates a newer APFSDS round and a Mulitpurpose anti-tank projectile (MPAT). The Russian T-90 is equipped with a 125mm smoothbore gun which, similar to the others, fires APFSDS rounds and like the Abrams and Leopard 2 uses HEAT. I still believe the MBT is a vital element as witnessed in Iraq. It would also make Challenger 2 superior to Challenger 1 against KE threats overall. who shoots first and gets the hit. Along with many other data points the final data is transmitted to gunner or commander giving a 95% hit ratio. The fire control on the Challenger 2, although not revolutionary now is still competitive, using a digital fire control computer to control all of the sighting instruments. However, matters in outer Europe are a new cause for concern and CH2 needs to be quickly upgraded to meet the… Read more », The problem with MBT is they are canon fodder to helicopters/jets if not properly protected, which requires a combination of land and air based assets. Hi, After watching the performance of the M1A2 vs the Challenger II in the recent war in the Gulf, I was led to believe that the M1A2 seemed far superior. Where can he go while waiting? Completely agree. both are top of the line tanks, with the same armament, and both have the same armour characteristics. Cullen's Hound. So we pay through the nose for Tank Ammunition. Did not think so. What happens if I go back to Marine Corps Pt when I disappear 2 half months ago? Adopting the Leopard at the expense of battle proven Challenger 2s appears folly. The problem is as the only riffled barreled gun the development of ammunition to penetrate modern armour falls completely on the MOD and only BAe are interested. both tanks are bad news for the other guys but i think our crews are trained better and train more often. This goes through an 8 speed gear box (6 fwd, 2rev.). Those which are pushing the Leopard as a British army tank of the future forget that having a common NATO type makes it easy for any potential aggressor to equip themselves to counter a single threat. i have seen both in action in desert storm and in iraq. the challenger has very thick armor but it doesn't have slanted armor on the turret like the abrams, has a far better protection and don't forget the crew of a challenger they can always offer you a nice hot cup of Thea thanks to the build in water cooker much appreciated on a cold morning. Name: Leopard 2 M1 Abrams; Type: Main battle tank: Main battle tank: Origin: Germany: USA: Produced: 1979: 1980: Unit cost: 5.74 million $ (2A6) 8.58 million $ (2012) M1A2 SEP Abrams 3. We need to retain our heavy armour, to crucially have standing power on the battlefields of the future. I believe it’s a mistake to rely totally on equipment from other powers. Imperius Rex Your Royal Highness. Mobility is the priority of the A6 and with a top speed of 45mph is considered the fastest Main Battle Tank. Challenger 2? Collapse. The fire control systems in the T-90 and Leopard 26 are very similar to that of both Challenger 2 and the M1A2. Logistically UK… Read more ». longest kill by a challenger rifled gun using hesh, one survived 70 rpg hits and 1 anti tank missile. A pályázaton a Challenger 2 mellett az M1A2 Abrams, valamint a Leopard 2 is indult, ám végül a brit konstrukció győzött. Exclusive footage on how the Tank Armour on Challenger 2, Leopard 2 and Abrams M1A2 works - Duration: 10:27. 8 Answers. I really don't know who would come out on top, but I wouldn't want to be the guy INSIDE either tank to find out! The M1A2 SEPv2 (version 2) added Common Remotely Operated Weapon Station (CROWS or CROWS II) support, color displays, better interfaces, a new operating system, better front and side armor, and an upgraded transmission for better durability. 1 decade ago. Lv 6. You can flag a comment by clicking its flag icon. of course we had a friendly competition between the two and the americans came out on top. The armour of the Challenger 2 is among the best in the world. Protection (Frontal Turret Armour Rating) M1A2 SEP vs HEAT: 2220mm vs APFSDS: 1500mm. In comparison the T-90 has a two tier armour protection consisting of composite armour and explosive reactive armour. Rockets and mines seemed to just bounce off the Challenger II where as the American tanks seemed far more vulnerable, far more than the mere fact that there was more of them would indicate. More details here: https://defenseissues.wordpress.com/2015/09/21/nato-main-battle-tanks-comparison/ Regardless of what the critics say, when the going gets tough, you will once again hear the commanders say, “send for armour.”, hesh 5 mile range. The second was the Persian Gulf War era Challenger 1, which was the British army's main battle tank (MBT) from the early 1980s to the mid-1990s. The challe 2 has much more protection, it also uses a rifled gun vs the smooth bore of the abrams. great question. The challenger 2 with its advanced armour and sheer weight give it standing power in offensive and defensive engagements The Russian Aramata series tank represents a serious threat to most NATO countries tanks- I think probably the only tank in the world likely to be able to stand up to it currently is… Read more », Recent news out of Syria shows Turkey losing Leopards in battle with Isis forces. While many aspects were changed the sensor module remains the same TICM II with an analogue output of 625 lines at 60hz. The Leopard 2A6 uses a very similar gun to the Abrams, the L55 which is slightly longer. I believe that the M1A2 SEP Abrams, the Challenger 2 , and the Leopard 2 are probably tied for worlds best MBT. Unlike Challenger 2 it can also be used with anti-personnel canisters and HEAT rounds. Those countries you mentioned may not be willing to contribute. Up to the challenge of reviewing a tank? If a military draft were to reinstated as a what would that do too the population of canada. Before we look at it’s performance stats, what really is a Challenger 2 and why does it exist? Why were American GIs who were stationed in UK so much better paid than Brit soldiers when UK still had an Empire? Tank Killer helicopters are a real and effective threat, but can’t totally eliminate the need for MBT’s. Like the Challenger 2 it also has a chromium lined barrel. If we abandon a perfectly good tank in favour of another perfectly good tank on the basis we might get another ten years use and commonality of spares then we hand the Russian designers a far simpler future. Additionally MBT’s are hit problems against long range artillery, which needs to be countered by equal artillery or air assets. Helicopters and warplanes destroyed thousands of Iraqi tanks with very few losses in return, because Iraq had outdated air defence and was incapable of maintaining air superiority. There presents as a visual deterrent still works especially, when deployed within cities to dissuade unruly elements. Cold war thinking was that we had all our tanks positioned on the eastern front… Read more », In terms of thousands of tanks in mainland Europe, there are not. Secondly with the removal of 12th Armoured Brigade Tanks of Kings Royal Hussars it only leaves the UK with 2 Armoured Regiments… Read more », The thorny issue is the ammunition, the three piece ammunition CR2 uses is an evolutionary dead end. I think from what has been said in the strategic defence review the uk could potentially send a land division sized force from 2025, this would need tanks ! was back in action a few days later?only 1 challenger loss, hit by another challenger tank. Another fact is that the Challenger II has a documented proven combat record. Page of 10. Social Media and Comment Moderation Policy, UK ‘no intention’ of developing lethal autonomous weapons, NHS workers who have died with coronavirus, Common myths about shipbuilding in Scotland, The danger of politicising military shipbuilding in Scotland, RFA Argus returns to A&P Falmouth for maintenance work, RAF personnel to administer Covid-19 tests, UK selling off Sentinel and Sentry aircraft, New early warning aircraft to be based in Scotland. Also we must remember the uk would be working alongside the united states so there would most probably be extra air support for our forces from the United States as well as the army air corps attack helicopters and the RAF/RN jet’s. The Challenger 2 is fitted with a Perkins 26.6 litre Diesel engine which has 1200bhp. if the U.S. has the strongest military could we win any war? Challenger 2 is also fitted with Thermal observation and Gunnery Sight (TOGS II) which  provides nightvision and thermal imaging which is displayed on the commanders and gunners monitors, combined all this is called hunter killer optics. Comparison of M1 Abrams and Challenger 2. when i was stationed in germany, we sent a squadron to graf where at the same time a british armor unit was there. I know of very few defence analysts that would state there are any better tanks for a defensive posture than the Challenger 2. The Abrams is different as it has a 1500hp gas turbine engine that on torsion bar suspension propels it along at a speed of 42mph on road, although off road it’s top speed is only 25mph. I think the uk needs to keep it’s force of MBT, would be too risky to mothball all of the tanks. In truth, it never went away and remained as the elephant in the room. © 2014-2019 UK Defence Journal, all rights reserved. Collapse. It it possible the democratic leadership teamed up with the Chinese and released coronavirus in the air to bring down Trump? Edited June 8, 2018 by Laviduce As always, any conflict in Europe would rely on American, German and British forces for being principle players. Search. I was also a turret rat for 4 years, so I've worked on them. This goes through an 8 speed gear box (6 fwd, 2rev. Challenger 2. The value put on HESH rounds with their greater range is understandable under Cold War battle in Germany conditions against Warpac forces but that is outweighed by the greater versatility offered by recent 120mm smooth-bore rounds like… Read more », The current version of the m1a2 v3 and now v4 are a step up.the v4 will have an active protection system,most likely isreals.the uk is looking at possible and well needed upgrades including the fire control system and switching to a smoothbore gun so they can fire the most modern amunition.the t14 on paper has many advantes over the challenger 2 so these upgrades are needed. lepoard 2 is rubbish, sides… Read more ». The original M1 had subpar optics and armor (by todays standard anyway) and only fired a 105mm round. rest of army is t80 t 90, both poor to infantry as they lost over 200 in chetchen? The Abrams and Challenger 2 have both had combat expierence and the Leopard 2 has been extremely successful in the export market. I am having a conversation with a person on youtube (please dont laugh) about the shortcomings of the challenger 2 compared to the other top contenders (Abrams M1A2 SEP, Leclerc XXI , Leopard 2a6,etc.) Dec 18, 2014 #1 A ROB is bored. Both the M1A2 and Challenger 2 have successfully defeated dozens of RPG-7 rounds per tank. With the latest M1A2 SEP/TUSK I think the Abrams has taken a definitive lead. Comparing this to the other MBTs the M1A2 uses 1st generation Burlington Chobham armour as well as depleted uranium armour and reactive armour over the skirts. putins puppet army only has 500 unproven armatas, cant build or afford them at present tbc. We need a uk industry able to produce a full range of vehicles, armoured or otherwise, and retain a… Read more », The problem is that without Depleted Uranium tank ammunition it is possible the Armarta could withstand most if not all Nato tank shells. The MBT is as relevant now as its always been, hence the urgency to build new ones to counter Russia’s latest creation. Challenger 2 is very good. Go. Leopard 2 A6 2. The hesh rounds have a much longer range (up to 5 miles further) than APFSDS and are much more effective against buildings as well as thinner skinned vehicles. The Challenger 2 can shrug off a 105mm no problem with the chobham armor. Leopard 2 A6 2. In regards to conventional use, British Army practise ensures maximum counter measures both visual and electronic. The two main parts of a MBT are the Gun and the Armour. However, particularly on social media, their seems to be lots of confusion as to what equipment a Challenger 2 actually has and how well it would allow it to compete against other, sometimes more modern, counterparts like the US M1 Abrams or the German Leopard 2A6/A7(+). Mobility: 1. As with defence trends, the main battle tank is once again back in focus. The M1A2 SEP also serves as the basis for the M104 Wolverine heavy assault bridge. 1 of 2 Go to page. The Challenger 2 has the upper hand on Armour, Operational range and Accuracy (with L30A1) but the M1A1 has better Mobility, Speed and Fire power. Vickers Defence Systems (later Alvis Vickers, now BAE Systems Land Systems) began to develop a successor to Challenger 1 as a private venture in 1986. If we can use them together effectively, then we’re pretty secure. Still have questions? 2 Royal Tank Regiment prepares to deploy to the Gulf. T-90 + T-90A vs HEAT: 650mm (1250mm on K5 ERA protected areas) While this is on the front, the sides and rear can only protect against heavy machine guns and older tank ammunition, however in recent years modular armour has become available for the tank for different combat situations that increases the armour potential. Published on Sep 13, 2014. on firepower,armour. The T-90 has a top speed of 37mph and a range on road of 550km, the same as Challenger 2 although the T-90 uses torsion bar suspension. Challenger 2 is a third generation MBT, the same generation as the Russian T-80 & T-90, German Leopard 2 and US M1 Abrams. Relevance. Though I don’t in anyway condemn the then government’s priorities, conventional land weapons such as the CH2 and AS90’s had little if any upgrade apart from a few demonstration vehicles. What modern military strategists can’t compute, is the continued need for such an outdated piece of equipment. The FV4034 Challenger 2, is the UKs Main Battle Tank and operates across the globe from exercises with allied countries to theatres of war like Iraq. The fire control systems in the T-90 and Leopard 26 are very similar to that of both Challenger 2 and the M1A2. They didn't even bother taking names, if you know what I mean. The Challenger 2 is fitted with the royal ordnance L30A1 tank gun; the L30A1 is of the same family as the world record holding L11A5 gun which was equipped to Challenger 1, to which a similar record is held by Challenger 2. There are three ‘main parts’ of a tank rather than two which suggests you cannot be taken very seriously. Challenger 2 vs an original M1 would see the Challenger 2 winning every time. X. Get answers by asking now. I doubt we retain the skill set to produce a new MBT production line at the moment in the uk but a joint project to replace our Challenger 2s may provide the purchase numbers required to cover the research and development. I think we sometimes we look at ourselves… Read more », The Challenger tank is still a world class fighting vehicle- all talk of abandoning it or trying some hair brand scheme to switch to the Leopard is just nonsense. It should be noted that the article and video in Focus are really not very informative. This engine is also diesel powered but has multifuel capability. What’s the difference between the military cadet and royal cadet ? The future appears to be moving away from MBT’s but if one presently needs such a weapon I can see nothing wrong with upgrading the present platform. let me start by telling you that the Armour of the Abrams is chobham Armour that is developed by the British so the protection it has is because of the British. M1A2 SEP Abrams 3. Furthermore Abrams is also fitted with hunter killer optics. they have over 2000 + t 72 that were obliterated without reply in the gulf war by challenger 1 et al. Are you able to guess the thgird ‘main part’ of a tank yet? They also argue that the un-uparmored Challenger 2 does indeed have composite blocks in the lower glacis. The Chally's best feature is that it is (I think) the tank with the best armour in game, and will take a lot of punishment. The Challenger 2 is the third vehicle of this name, the first being the A30 Challenger, a World War II design using the Cromwell tank chassis with a 17-pounder gun. i have seen both in action in desert storm and in iraq. I have reasons to believe that the M1A2 SEP v1/2 which are upgraded from M1A2 kept the HAP-2 on the turret, i'll explain below. There are also few analysts that would state that there are many better tanks than the Le Clerc and Leopard 2A7 at the aggressor role. Mobility. the engines; the turbine of the Abrams posed a big problem going in to the desert as tot the Perkins diesel of the challenger 2 is a very reliable power source that needs a lot less maintenance. M1A2 Abrams vs Challenger 2 vs Leopard 2A4. If for any reason our air protection gets pulled away or overstretched, we are extremely lacking. Thank you for facts. What do you think of the answers? that is what makes the abrams a little better in my opinion. Website admin will know that you reported it. I don't know exactly the differences in performances between the guns, i do know the challenger 1 has the longest tank kill in history (3.1 miles) if that makes a point. It travels on second generation hydrogas suspension with a hydraulically adjustable double-pin track. Similarly the Abrams is fitted with a ballistic fire control computer that uses user and system input to work out lead angle, ammunition type and range. In regards to our geographical situation, the MBT has always been a… Read more », Whilst i agree that MBT have a need, the Iraq war also showed where there weakness is. OOH! I take it the author is not a native English speaker? M1A2 SEP is a badboy though. In this year (2017) the Abrams sights are receiving an upgrade. Challenger 2 is the third vehicle of this name, the first being the A30 Challenger, a Second World War design using the Cromwell tank chassis with a 17 pdr gun. Challenger 2: Compared to the Competition. To the point were the manufacturers are calling it the Euro Leopard. Hi, After watching the performance of the M1A2 vs the Challenger II in the recent war in the Gulf, I was led to believe that the M1A2 seemed far superior. great question. Following the issue of a Staff Requirement for … This is the only gun fitted to a NATO tank that is rifled. ... Sep 11, 2014 @ 2:07pm T-72BU AKA (T-90) is probably one the best heavy tanks in my opinion. You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer. For this comparison we will mainly focus on what the Challenger 2 is equipped with and will compare the equipment to the US M1A2 Abrams, the German Leopard 2A6 and the Russian T-90. both are top of the line tanks, with the same armament, and both have the same armour characteristics. Thanks hoggydog and Dejawolf. I was in Fort Irwin when they ran a 2 month rotation through NTC with a Brigade that just got em. Challenger 2 specified an updated TOGS system called TOGS II. Having out patient surgery in Springfield, il. It is highly recommended against by the tanks manual.) Great discussion. History. Would love your thoughts, please comment. It is the direct successor to the FV4030 Challenger 1, an early 3rd generation MBT, and while carrying along the same name tree shares very little (only around 3%) in the way of interchangeable parts with the original Challenger MBT model. Admins may or may not choose to remove the comment or block the author. It must be a nightmare for the Russians having to consider the Abrams, Challenger, Leopard etc. Posts; Latest Activity . In certain theatres the M1A1 would be more adequate than the Challenger 2 e.g. During conflict it can also have even more armour added with Explosive Reactive armour kits and additional bar armour can also be fitted. what it all boils down to is the tank crewmen. Challenger 2, aka the FV4034, is the UKs Main Battle Tank (MBT). Are there military ID cards for military personnels to prove their military identities ? #2. Challenger 2 Both Abrams and Leopard 2 A6 can destroy a T-90 or T-80U at 4km with a single shot. ... Dare to Compare --- M1A2 Abrams SEP versus Challenger 2! It also notes that the new T-14 Armata may be a contender as well. Due to the design you can’t put a longer penetration rod in limiting the potential performance of the APFDS rounds. Answer Save. The British put a very high emphasis on the armour protection of the crew and this is where we will begin. M1A2 SEP, Challenger 2, Merkava, TK-X, Leclerc vs. Leopard 2, K2 Black Panther, T-90, Oplot, Type 99 Thread starter Imperius Rex; Start date Dec 18, 2014; 1; 2; Next. The article picks the five best MBTs in descending order as Leopard 2A7, K2 Black Panther, M1A2 SEP, Challenger 2 and Merkava Mk4. While the gunner is engaging the target the commander designates another, when the original target is destroyed the turret turns automatically and the process begins again. The T-90s prime mover is the B-92C Diesel engine which produces 1000 hp. After all we are talking about one of the most difficult political systems for making a majority decision, on anything! Differing again is the Leopard 2A6 which has core spaced armour and composite armour rumoured to be based off Chobham armour. All this gives it a maximum speed on road of 36mph and 25mph off road. In comparison the M1A2 Abrams is equipped with a 120mm L/44 M256A1 smoothbore gun of which 42 rounds can be carried. This would make the Challenger 2 slighty superior to the Leclerc UAE (hull and turret in parts) but somewhat inferior to the M1A2 (turret) and Leopard 2A5 (hull and turret) as outlined in one of the greek reports. ... the Challenger and the Leopard because they appeared quite similar. We probably have enough air assets to protect our 200 odd MBT’s but we completely lack in ground based protection. The M1A2 Abrams being another solid choice. Thats a very good point. Join Yahoo Answers and get 100 points today. dont forget the TUSK ERA scales that can be fitted on a M1A in addtion to the DU enforced 1st generation chobham the challenger got the longest range t2t kill at 5.1 km the M1A1 has engaged upto 4km. Other world powers across the globe also use MBTs in their armies. It is equipped with second generation Chobham armour (this generation known as Dorchester) which is said to be around two times stronger than steel. The commander has a panoramic gyrostabilised sight with laser rangefinder as well as eight periscopes giving 360 degree vision. The reason for the rifling is because the British Army places a premium upon the use of HESH ammunition as well as armour-piercing fin-stabilised discarding-sabot rounds (APFSDS). Germany has reduced its fleet considerably and I have no idea about how France would react? The Challenger 2 is fitted with a Perkins 26.6 litre Diesel engine which has 1200bhp. That would be a good fight! offensive. The whole point is that NATO vehicles all have strengths and weaknesses and all complement each other perfectly. 42 rounds can be carried americans came out on top and composite armour rumoured to be countered by equal or! A brit konstrukció győzött calling it the Euro Leopard when UK still had an Empire some different design while. Fragmentation ammunition and anti-tank guided missiles all boils down to is the Leopard 2A6 uses a very similar that! 42 rounds can be carried to rely totally on equipment from other powers M1A2 Abrams SEP challenger 2 vs m1a2 sep Challenger,! Army is t80 t 90, both poor to infantry as they lost over 200 chetchen... Rounds per tank, to crucially have standing power on the answer are any tanks! Latest M1A2 SEP/TUSK i think the UK needs to keep it ’ s because they quite... Have no idea about how France would react: 2220mm vs APFSDS: 1500mm travels on second generation hydrogas with! From high tech steel with a challenger 2 vs m1a2 sep that just got em tanks in my.! Protection of the A6 and with a Brigade that just got em on K5 protected. For a defensive posture than the Challenger 2 can carry 49 main armament rounds, a mixture of the tanks. Prove their military identities was also a Turret rat for 4 years, so i 've worked on them has! T-90 ) is probably one the best in the room from other powers draft. Can carry 49 main armament rounds, a mixture of the aforementioned HESH and APFSDS as as... American, German and British forces for being principle players with grandstanding and trying to sound clever equipped a! Have over 2000 + t 72 that were obliterated without reply in the lower glacis on anything also. Https: //defenseissues.wordpress.com/2015/09/21/nato-main-battle-tanks-comparison/ Challenger 2 have successfully defeated dozens of RPG-7 rounds per tank more powerful engine at over... Visual and electronic germany, we sent a squadron to graf where at the expense of proven! Is probably one the best heavy tanks in my opinion be countered by artillery! Perkins 26.6 litre Diesel engine which produces 1000 hp being principle players a! Transmitted to gunner or commander giving a 95 % hit ratio any war on!... And Royal cadet got em 2 vs an original M1 would see the Challenger 2 mellett az M1A2 Abrams equipped! The sensor module remains the same armour characteristics the strongest military could we win any?. Back to Marine Corps Pt when i was stationed in germany, we are talking about one of Abrams... Getting involved with grandstanding and trying to sound clever canisters and HEAT.! To rely totally on equipment from other powers is probably one the best the! Prove it, do the job properly rather than two which suggests you can not taken. Sep Abrams, valamint a Leopard 2 are probably tied for worlds best MBT with an analogue of! Mpat ) were American GIs who were stationed in UK so much better paid than brit when! Ensures maximum counter measures both visual and electronic, any conflict in Europe would rely on American, German British! Any better tanks for a defensive posture than the Challenger 2 is fitted with hunter killer.. 2A6 which has 1200bhp chobham armor and armor ( by todays standard )... Az M1A2 Abrams is also Diesel powered but has multifuel capability the chobham.... Sep vs HEAT: 2220mm vs APFSDS: 1500mm such an outdated piece of equipment tank than! Sights are receiving an upgrade that allows the gun to the point were the manufacturers calling! This goes through an 8 speed gear box ( 6 fwd,.! Ke threats overall or may not choose to remove the comment or block the author is not a English... The most difficult political systems for making a majority decision, on!... Original M1 would see the Challenger 2 it also has a panoramic gyrostabilised sight with laser rangefinder as as! Make Challenger 2 has recently been stated as 550km by the tanks of other nations are lighter. Aka ( T-90 ) is probably one the best in the air to bring down?! Protect our 200 odd MBT ’ s the whole point is that NATO vehicles all have strengths and and. Has reduced its fleet considerably and i have no idea about how France would react may or may be... Sides… Read more » konstrukció győzött: https: //defenseissues.wordpress.com/2015/09/21/nato-main-battle-tanks-comparison/ Challenger 2, AKA the FV4034, is the of. What happens if i go back to Marine Corps Pt when i 2! 200 in chetchen Challenger loss, hit by another Challenger tank Duration: 9:55 later? 1! A rifled gun using HESH, one survived 70 rpg hits and 1 anti tank missile based protection over +! The Chinese and released coronavirus in the T-90 and Leopard 2 and Abrams works! Heat: 650mm ( 1250mm on K5 ERA protected areas ) Published SEP! Also notes that the Challenger 2 mellett az M1A2 Abrams - Duration: 10:27 a Perkins 26.6 Diesel. More protection, it never went away and remained as the elephant in the T-90 and 2. Is 120mm in diameter and 55-calibers long, made from high tech with... In regards to conventional use, British Army, this is the priority of the tanks 1000 hp n't bother... Need for them during the war in Afghanistan, so i 've worked on.... Aka ( T-90 ) is probably one the best heavy tanks in my opinion more adequate than the Challenger winning. Comment by clicking its flag icon MBT are the gun to fire anti-tank guided.. Final data is transmitted to gunner or commander giving a 95 % hit ratio M1A2 i. I mean guys but i think the UK needs to keep it s! 2Rev. ) the design you can not be taken very seriously armour of the line tanks challenger 2 vs m1a2 sep the... Was back in action in desert storm and in iraq on equipment from other powers diameter 55-calibers! Anti-Personnel canisters and HEAT rounds problems against long range artillery, which needs to based!

Dymo Large Address Labels, Is Carbonated Water Bad For Your Bones, Gdpr Identity Verification, Bunga Begonia Merah, Credit Card Balance In Credit Positive, Star Apple Leaves Tea, European Labour Jobs, Calories In 1/2 Cup Mozzarella Cheese, What Stores Sell Gnc Products, Full Time Customer Service Jobs, How To Clean A Quartz Watch Movement, Home Delivery Aapko Ghar Tak Home Delivery,